Academy/Administrative & Regulatory Law/Administrative Hearings and Adjudication
Lesson 4 of 5

Administrative Hearings and Adjudication

Administrative Hearings and Adjudication

When agencies make decisions about individual rights, obligations, or privileges, they often do so through administrative adjudication — a quasi-judicial process that is less formal than a courtroom trial but still provides important procedural safeguards.

Types of Administrative Adjudication

Formal adjudication (Sections 556–557 of the APA) is required when a statute provides that a matter must be determined "on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing." Features include:

  • A hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
  • The right to present evidence and witnesses
  • The right to cross-examine opposing witnesses
  • A decision based on the record of the hearing
  • A written decision with findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • Informal adjudication — the vast majority of agency decisions (permit approvals, benefit determinations, enforcement actions) do not require formal hearings. The APA sets minimal requirements — agencies must provide notice and a brief statement of reasons.

    Administrative Law Judges

    ALJs are independent hearing officers within federal agencies. They enjoy protections designed to ensure impartiality:

  • Hired through a merit selection process
  • Protected from removal except for good cause established by the Merit Systems Protection Board
  • Cannot be supervised or evaluated by the agency's enforcement staff
  • Must base decisions solely on the evidence in the record
  • Due Process Requirements

    The Due Process Clause (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments) requires that individuals receive adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard before the government deprives them of a protected interest.

    The Supreme Court's framework from Mathews v. Eldridge (1976) balances three factors:

    1. The private interest affected

    2. The risk of error under current procedures and the value of additional safeguards

    3. The government's interest in efficiency and fiscal integrity

    Common Types of Administrative Hearings

  • Social Security disability hearings — claimants appeal denied disability benefits before an ALJ
  • Immigration hearings — immigration judges decide removal (deportation) cases
  • SEC enforcement proceedings — the SEC brings cases against securities law violators before its own ALJs
  • OSHA hearings — employers contest workplace safety citations
  • Workers' compensation hearings — injured workers seek benefits
  • Agency Appeals

    After an ALJ decision, parties may typically appeal to the agency head or an appellate body within the agency (e.g., the Social Security Appeals Council, the Board of Immigration Appeals). The agency head may review and reverse ALJ decisions.

    Quiz: Administrative Hearings and Adjudication

    Question 1 of 3

    What is an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)?