Notice2026-11863
Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 12, 2026
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise below normal value during the period of review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 113 (Friday, June 12, 2026)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35661-35662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2026-11863]
[[Page 35661]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883]
Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2023-2024
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made
sales of subject merchandise below normal value during the period of
review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024.
DATES: Applicable June 12, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 18, 2025, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
the 2023-2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
glycine from India.\1\ Due to a backlog of documents that were
electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS)
during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce
tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 21 days.\2\
Between April 3 and May 20, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for
these final results by 60 days.\3\ Accordingly, the deadline for these
final results is now June 8, 2026.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and Rescission,
In Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024, 90 FR
51650 (November 18, 2025) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
\3\ See Memoranda, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated April 3, 2026;
``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated May 20, 2026.
\4\ The deadline for these final results is June 7, 2026.
However, because the extended deadline falls on the weekend, the
deadline becomes the next business day (i.e., June 8, 2026). See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule
for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff
Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of the events that followed the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Glycine from India; 2023-2024,'' dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>6</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170 (June 21, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the Order is glycine from India. For a
complete description of the scope of this Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by
interested parties in this administrative review are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an
appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered
users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/frnotices">https://access.trade.gov/frnotices</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties on the Preliminary Results, we find it appropriate
to apply a dumping margin based on facts available to Kumar Industries
(Kumar), in accordance with section 776(a) of the Act, because
necessary information is not available on the record, Kumar withheld
requested information, failed to provide such information by the
established deadlines, and significantly impeded this proceeding.
Further, Commerce determines that an adverse inference is warranted in
selecting from among the facts otherwise available pursuant to section
776(b) of the Act because Kumar failed to cooperate by not acting to
the best of its ability to comply with a request for information. We
made no changes to the margin calculations for Paras Intermediaries
Private Limited.\8\ For further discussion, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As explained in Comment 3 of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, we intend to revise the final liquidation instructions
to include the U.S. importer and/or customer information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the POR June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kumar Industries............................................ 57.17
Paras Intermediaries Private Limited........................ 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its analysis performed to interested
parties in the final results of this administrative review within five
days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise covered by the final results of this
review.\9\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent), we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's
examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final
results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific
assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis,
Commerce will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping
duties on appropriate entries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in
Certain Antidumping Proceeding; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all
U.S. sales to that
[[Page 35662]]
importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer
(or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and
the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we will apply the
assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/customer's
entries during the POR.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of
the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 7.23 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy
rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation.\10\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Order, 84 FR at 29171.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the
amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 8, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: The Application of Total Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) to Kumar
Comment 2: Financial Statements Used to Calculate Constructed
Value (CV)
Comment 3: Importer-Specific Assessment Rates
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2026-11863 Filed 6-11-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 12, 2026.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.