All CRS Reports
R45539

Asylum and Refugee Policy: Legal Framework and Processing Challenges

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: April 2026
Andorra BrunoOctober 20, 2025
asylumrefugeesimmigrationhumanitarian protection

Summary

This report examines the legal framework for asylum and refugee protection in the United States, including the Refugee Act of 1980, the asylum provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and international obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol.

The report discusses the asylum application process, including affirmative and defensive asylum procedures, credible fear and reasonable fear screenings, and the expedited removal process. It analyzes the asylum case backlog, immigration court processing times, and recent regulatory changes to asylum eligibility criteria.

Policy considerations include refugee admissions ceilings, the resettlement program, the impact of safe third country agreements, temporary protected status designations, and proposals to reform the asylum system to address both protection needs and processing efficiency.

Full Report Analysis

Key Findings

The U.S. asylum system faces an unprecedented backlog of approximately 3.5 million pending cases in immigration courts, with average wait times exceeding four years, creating significant challenges for both asylum seekers and the immigration system.
Annual refugee admissions declined from a ceiling of 110,000 in FY2017 to a historic low of 15,000 in FY2021, before being raised to 125,000 for FY2024 and FY2025, though actual admissions have consistently fallen short of ceilings in recent years.
Encounters at the southern border have fluctuated dramatically, with CBP recording over 2 million encounters in FY2023, straining asylum processing capacity and border management resources.
The distinction between affirmative asylum (filed with USCIS within one year of arrival) and defensive asylum (raised as a defense in removal proceedings) creates different procedural pathways with significantly different processing times and outcomes.

Background

The United States' asylum and refugee system is rooted in international obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which define a refugee as a person who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of nationality due to persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The Refugee Act of 1980 codified these protections in U.S. law, establishing the modern framework for both overseas refugee resettlement and domestic asylum adjudication.

The asylum system distinguishes between individuals who apply affirmatively for asylum and those who raise asylum claims defensively in removal proceedings. Individuals arriving at the border or apprehended without proper documentation are placed in expedited removal proceedings, where they must pass a credible fear screening to be referred for full asylum hearings before an immigration judge. The credible fear standard requires demonstrating a "significant possibility" of establishing eligibility for asylum, a threshold lower than the ultimate standard of proof for an asylum grant.

Current Law

Under the INA, individuals physically present in the United States or arriving at a port of entry may apply for asylum regardless of immigration status, subject to certain bars including the one-year filing deadline for affirmative applications, the safe third country bar, and bars based on criminal activity or terrorism-related grounds. Asylum applicants must demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. Withholding of removal under the INA and protection under the Convention Against Torture provide alternative forms of protection with different standards and benefits.

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) allows nationals of designated countries affected by armed conflict, environmental disaster, or other extraordinary conditions to remain and work in the United States. Deferred enforced departure provides similar protection through executive action. Unaccompanied alien children receive additional procedural protections under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, including placement with the Office of Refugee Resettlement and access to the asylum process outside expedited removal.

Policy Options

Asylum reform proposals include establishing a right to counsel for asylum seekers to reduce procedural inefficiencies, increasing the number of immigration judges and asylum officers to reduce backlogs, modifying the credible fear standard, eliminating or modifying the one-year filing deadline, and creating alternative processing pathways for protection claims. Some proposals would establish asylum processing centers in countries of origin or transit to reduce irregular migration.

Refugee program options include increasing refugee admissions ceilings and strengthening the resettlement infrastructure, expanding private sponsorship of refugees, reforming the security screening process to reduce delays while maintaining thoroughness, and developing reception and integration support for newly arrived refugees. The balance between deterrence-focused border policies and protection-focused asylum access remains a fundamental policy tension, with humanitarian, fiscal, and national security considerations all weighing on the debate.

Recent Developments

Executive actions have significantly shaped asylum policy, including changes to credible fear screening standards, implementation of asylum processing rules at the border, and the use of parole authority for nationals of specific countries. The immigration court backlog has continued to grow despite increases in immigration judge hiring. International cooperation on migration management has included negotiations with Mexico and Central American countries on border management and regional processing arrangements. Congress has debated comprehensive border security and asylum reform packages, with bipartisan proposals addressing border enforcement, asylum processing, and immigration court resources.

Note: This is a summary of a Congressional Research Service report. CRS reports are prepared for Members of Congress and their staffs. This summary is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.