All CRS Reports
R45558

Criminal Justice Reform: Federal Sentencing, Reentry, and Policing

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: April 2026
Nathan JamesAugust 25, 2025
criminal justicesentencing reformprisonspolicing

Summary

This report provides an overview of federal criminal justice reform efforts, focusing on the First Step Act of 2018 and its implementation. It examines changes to mandatory minimum sentencing, good time credit calculations, and the expansion of reentry programming in the federal prison system.

The report discusses the federal Bureau of Prisons' implementation of the risk and needs assessment system, compassionate release provisions, and earned time credit programs. Data on the federal prison population, recidivism rates, and the costs of incarceration are presented.

Additional topics include proposals for further sentencing reform, the role of federal funding in supporting state and local criminal justice initiatives, police reform legislation, qualified immunity debates, and the impact of reforms on public safety and racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

Full Report Analysis

Key Findings

The First Step Act of 2018 represented the most significant bipartisan federal criminal justice reform in decades, reducing certain mandatory minimum sentences, expanding compassionate release authority, and establishing the earned time credit system to incentivize participation in rehabilitative programming.
The federal prison population has declined from a peak of approximately 219,000 in 2013 to roughly 158,000 in 2025, though federal prisons remain operating above rated capacity with persistent staffing shortages.
Approximately 45% of federal inmates are incarcerated for drug offenses, and racial disparities persist throughout the federal criminal justice system, with Black individuals comprising approximately 38% of the federal prison population while representing 13% of the U.S. population.
The Bureau of Prisons has released over 30,000 inmates to supervised release under First Step Act earned time credit provisions, with preliminary data suggesting lower recidivism rates among program participants.

Background

The federal criminal justice system encompasses investigation, prosecution, adjudication, incarceration, and post-release supervision of federal offenses. The system grew substantially during the 1980s and 1990s as Congress enacted mandatory minimum sentencing provisions, the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines were established, and federal drug enforcement was expanded. By the 2010s, growing concerns about mass incarceration, racial disparities, the cost of imprisonment, and evidence regarding the limited deterrent effect of lengthy sentences generated bipartisan support for reform.

The First Step Act of 2018 addressed both sentencing and prison reform. Sentencing provisions reduced the mandatory minimum for certain drug offenses with prior convictions (from 20 years to 15 years, and from life to 25 years), broadened the existing safety valve provision allowing judges to sentence below mandatory minimums for low-level drug offenders, and made retroactive the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010's reduction in the crack-to-powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Prison reform provisions directed the Bureau of Prisons to develop a risk and needs assessment system (PATTERN) and create incentives for participation in evidence-based recidivism reduction programming.

Current Law

Federal sentencing is governed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, which created the U.S. Sentencing Commission and established advisory sentencing guidelines following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker (2005). Mandatory minimum sentences continue to apply to many federal drug and firearms offenses, though the safety valve and substantial assistance provisions provide mechanisms for sentences below the minimums in certain circumstances. Judges retain discretion to vary from guideline ranges based on the sentencing factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a).

The Bureau of Prisons administers 122 federal prisons and contracts with private facilities and residential reentry centers. The First Step Act's earned time credit system allows eligible inmates to earn credits toward early transfer to supervised release through participation in approved programs. Compassionate release may be granted by courts upon motion by the BOP or by inmates who have exhausted administrative remedies, based on extraordinary and compelling circumstances.

Policy Options

Proposals for further reform include eliminating or reducing additional mandatory minimum sentences, expanding the safety valve, reforming federal supervised release and revocation practices, decriminalizing certain drug offenses, and addressing the federal death penalty. Legislation to reform qualified immunity for law enforcement officers, establish national use-of-force standards, and create federal standards for police misconduct databases has been debated but not enacted.

Conservative reform proposals focus on expanding reentry programming, reducing recidivism through faith-based and vocational programs, incentivizing employment of formerly incarcerated individuals, and improving conditions of confinement. Progressive proposals include reducing the use of solitary confinement, eliminating cash bail in the federal system, addressing racial disparities through prosecutorial reform, and investing in community-based violence intervention and prevention programs.

Recent Developments

Implementation of the First Step Act continues, with ongoing debates about the accuracy and potential bias of the PATTERN risk assessment tool, the availability of programming in federal prisons, and the BOP's management of earned time credits. Congressional oversight has focused on BOP staffing shortages, conditions of confinement, and the use of restrictive housing. The Sentencing Commission has resumed operations after a period without a quorum and has taken steps to expand retroactive application of amended guidelines and address sentencing disparities.

Note: This is a summary of a Congressional Research Service report. CRS reports are prepared for Members of Congress and their staffs. This summary is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.