All CRS Reports
R46406

Election Administration: Federal Role in Campaign Finance and Voting

Federal & State Law Editorial TeamLast reviewed: April 2026
R. Sam GarrettOctober 5, 2025
electionscampaign financevoting rightsfec

Summary

This report examines the federal role in election administration, including the Federal Election Commission's oversight of campaign finance, the Election Assistance Commission's role in supporting state and local election officials, and the Department of Justice's enforcement of voting rights laws.

Key topics include the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), and recent Supreme Court decisions affecting campaign finance regulation, such as Citizens United v. FEC and McCutcheon v. FEC. The report also discusses election security measures and federal funding for election infrastructure upgrades.

Congressional considerations include proposals to reform campaign finance disclosure requirements, enhance election cybersecurity, implement automatic voter registration, and address issues related to redistricting and gerrymandering.

Full Report Analysis

Key Findings

Federal campaign finance law permits unlimited independent expenditures by individuals, corporations, and unions following Citizens United v. FEC (2010), while maintaining contribution limits to candidates and party committees.
Total federal election spending has grown dramatically, from approximately $3.1 billion in the 2000 cycle to over $15 billion in the 2024 cycle, with outside spending by super PACs and other independent groups accounting for an increasing share.
The Federal Election Commission, structured with three Republican and three Democratic commissioners, has frequently deadlocked on enforcement matters, leading to criticism that the campaign finance regulatory framework lacks effective oversight.
State and local election officials administer elections under widely varying rules, with the federal government providing funding, standards, and oversight through HAVA, the NVRA, and the Voting Rights Act.

Background

The federal role in election administration reflects the constitutional structure in which states have primary responsibility for conducting elections, subject to congressional authority under the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4) and the enforcement provisions of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), as amended in 1974, established the modern framework for regulating campaign finance in federal elections, creating the FEC, imposing contribution and expenditure limits, and requiring financial disclosure by candidates and political committees.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly addressed the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations. Buckley v. Valeo (1976) upheld contribution limits as serving the government's interest in preventing corruption or its appearance, while striking down expenditure limits as unconstitutional restrictions on political speech. Subsequent decisions, particularly Citizens United v. FEC (2010) and McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), further expanded First Amendment protections for political spending, striking down the ban on corporate and union independent expenditures and eliminating aggregate contribution limits.

Current Law

Under current law, individual contribution limits are adjusted for inflation each election cycle. For the 2025-2026 cycle, individuals may contribute up to $3,300 per election to a candidate committee, $41,300 per year to a national party committee, and $5,000 per year to a traditional political action committee. Super PACs may raise and spend unlimited amounts on independent expenditures but may not contribute directly to candidates or coordinate with their campaigns. The FEC requires regular disclosure reports from candidates, party committees, PACs, and super PACs.

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 created the Election Assistance Commission and established minimum standards for voting systems, provisional voting, voter registration databases, and voter identification. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires states to offer voter registration opportunities at motor vehicle agencies and public assistance offices. Election security has received increased attention, with federal funding provided for election infrastructure upgrades, vulnerability assessments, and cybersecurity support through CISA.

Policy Options

Campaign finance reform proposals include requiring disclosure of donors to organizations that engage in political advertising, establishing public financing systems for congressional campaigns to reduce reliance on large donors, strengthening FEC enforcement through restructuring the commission to an odd number of commissioners, and enacting constitutional amendments to overturn Citizens United. Some proposals would impose additional restrictions on coordination between candidates and outside groups.

Election administration proposals include establishing national standards for early voting and mail-in voting, mandating paper ballot records for audit purposes, implementing automatic or same-day voter registration, requiring post-election risk-limiting audits, and increasing federal funding for election infrastructure modernization. Proposals to address redistricting include requiring independent commissions and establishing criteria for congressional district maps.

Recent Developments

The 2024 election cycle saw continued growth in campaign spending and increasing use of small-dollar online fundraising platforms. Debates over election administration have intensified, with states enacting varying rules regarding mail-in voting, ballot drop boxes, voter identification, and post-election processes. Federal cybersecurity support for elections has expanded, with CISA providing enhanced services to state and local election officials. Congressional activity has included proposals for comprehensive election reform, though significant legislation has not advanced due to partisan disagreements.

Note: This is a summary of a Congressional Research Service report. CRS reports are prepared for Members of Congress and their staffs. This summary is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.