Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.
580 F. App'x 985 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Opinion Summary
Addressed design patent infringement damages in the smartphone patent wars between Apple and Samsung. The Federal Circuit considered whether damages for design patent infringement should be based on the entire product or only the infringing component, a question later resolved by the Supreme Court in Samsung Electronics v. Apple.
Related Cases
McCulloch v. Maryland
17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)
Upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States under the Necessary and Proper Clause and held that states cannot tax federal institutions. Chief Justice Marshall established a broad interpretation of congressional power, declaring that the federal government possesses implied powers beyond those enumerated in the Constitution.
Gibbons v. Ogden
22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824)
Held that the Commerce Clause grants Congress broad power to regulate interstate commerce, including navigation. States cannot grant monopolies that interfere with congressionally authorized interstate trade. Established the foundation for federal regulatory power over economic activity crossing state lines.
Lochner v. New York
198 U.S. 45 (1905)
Struck down a New York law limiting bakery workers to a 60-hour work week, holding it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's protection of liberty of contract. Inaugurated the 'Lochner era' of aggressive judicial review of economic regulations, which lasted until the late 1930s. Now widely criticized as judicial overreach.
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
379 U.S. 241 (1964)
Upheld Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited racial discrimination in places of public accommodation. The Court ruled that Congress had authority under the Commerce Clause to prohibit racial discrimination in hotels and motels serving interstate travelers.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
567 U.S. 519 (2012)
Upheld the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power, while holding it exceeded Commerce Clause authority. Also held that the ACA's Medicaid expansion was impermissibly coercive to the states. Chief Justice Roberts joined the liberal justices to save the law's central provision.
Case Information
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Court Level
- U.S. Court of Appeals
- Circuit
- Federal Circuit
- Date Decided
- Tuesday, November 18, 2014
- Citation
- 580 F. App'x 985 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
- Jurisdiction
- United States Federal